However, the response of his folks was already terribly hardened and callousĮxpel the household of Lut out of your metropolis. My cost is simply from the Lord of the worlds.Īs if holding up a mirror in the entrance of his folks, Lut AS tried to make them take a look at the awfulness of their perverted habits and prison behaviors.ĭo you commit immorality if you are seeing? Do you indeed choose men to approach rather than ladies? Reasonably, you’re folks behaving ignorantly. And assuring his folks of his absolute reliability, he added,Ĭertainly, I’m to you a reliable messenger. Interesting to them to replicate their accountability to their Creator. However, they ignored and rejected Prophet Lut’s guidance and warnings, and continued their inaccurate unnatural acts. That’s why Allah (S.W.T.) commanded Lut (A.S.) to settle amongst them and guide them to worship Allah (S.W.T.) alone. No one in the history of mankind had ever experienced or practiced homosexuality before the people of Sodom. They had been doing it openly and without guilt or embarrassment. This unnatural act was also known as sodomy.
But, the biggest evil act of those people was homosexuality, man had sex with a man instead of with a woman. Travelers passing Sodom were often waylaid and robbed by Sodom city people.
Sodom was the most corrupt city during that time. There is no more detail about Prophet Lut’s (AS) earlier life. Lut (AS) then migrated to the city of Sodom which was close to the western shore of the Dead Sea. Ibrahim (A.S.), his wife Sarah (p.b.u.h), and Lut (A.S.) left Babylon and traveled to a city called Ur, then to a place called Haran, then to Palestine and kept calling people to worship Allah (s.w.t), showed them the right path, helping the poor, then relocated to Egypt. As mentioned above, al-Dhahabi rejected this tradition and classified it as unreliable.Prophet Lut or Lot (A.S.) was the nephew of the Prophet Ibrahim (A.S.) and Lut (A.S.) was born and raised by his uncle Ibrahim (A.S.). However, al-Hakim Nisapuri acquired a reputation among hadith scholars as a careless critic of hadith whose verdicts can only be deemed credible when endorsed by the eminent scholar al-Dhahabi. 1014CE) who recorded it in his collection entitled al-Mustadrak. The only scholar known to have classified it as authentic is al-Hakim Nisapuri (d. (See, Al-Zayla‘i, Jamal al-Din, Nasb al-raya: Takhrij ahadith al-Hidaya, Jeddah: Dar al-Qibla, nd. 1348) and others who classified it and all its various chains of transmission as “unreliable”, “very weak”, “inauthentic” and “unfounded”. 1361) provided a detailed analysis of all the chains of transmission of this hadith and cited numerous renowned authorities in the field of hadith such as Yahya Ibn Ma‘in (d. The eminent hadith scholar and jurist Jamal al-Din al-Zayla‘i (d.
None of the traditions attributed to the Prophet Muhammad on this subject was accepted as authentic or “strong”, even by a small group of hadith scholars. Other versions of this tradition do not mention the death penalty or any punishment. Both were classified as “very weak” and unreliable. There are other versions of this tradition attributed to Jabir b. Thus, it is classified as khabar al-wahid, which means a hadith related by a single authority or through a solitary chain of transmission.
This tradition is narrated on the authority of only two of the companions of the Prophet, namely Ibn Abbas and Abu Hurayra. However I came across an article stating that due to it chain of narrators it is not reliable this is what it states: Al-Husain from 'Ikrimah on the authority of Ibn 'Abbas who transmitted it from the Prophet (ﷺ). It has also been transmitted by Ibn Juraij from Ibrahim from Dawud b. Mansur transmitted it from 'Ikrimah on the authority of Ibn 'Abbas who transmitted it from the Prophet (ﷺ). The Prophet (ﷺ) said: If you find anyone doing as Lot's people did, kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done.Ību Dawud said: A similar tradition has also been transmitted by Sulaiman b.
0 kommentar(er)
